Goodwin's appellate litigators have briefed and argued hundreds of high stakes appeals, securing victories for clients in federal and state appellate courts throughout the United States. Lawyers in our Appellate Litigation practice are experts at working cooperatively as part of a team — alongside trial counsel and subject-matter experts — to preserve and present the best possible case on appeal and maximize our clients’ chances for success.

Goodwin lawyers have established a record of success in every federal court of appeals and in state appellate courts from Alabama to Wyoming. Six members of the group were U.S. Supreme Court clerks, numerous others clerked on the federal courts of appeals or on state supreme courts, and several previously worked in the U.S. Solicitor General’s office, which houses the government’s top Supreme Court and appellate counsel.

Respectfully Submitted: Goodwin Appellate Briefs is a collection of briefs for the matters we’ve handle across multiple jurisdictions and practice areas.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology v. Shire

Goodwin represented MIT and the Children’s Medical Center Corporation in a dispute against Shire Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Shire Regenerative Medicine, Inc. (collectively, “Shire”) for infringement of two patents concerning the production of a three-dimensional scaffolding that would allow pre-grown cells to produce organ tissue in a patient. Goodwin prevailed in…

Read More

American Freedom Defense Initiative v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority

Goodwin attorneys successfully persuaded the Supreme Court to deny the petition for certiorari in a First Amendment challenge brought by the American Freedom Defense Initiative to the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority’s application of its advertising guidelines. The case raised the question of when a public transit authority creates a designated…

Read More

Joseph A. Pakootas et al. v. State of Washington Amicus Brief

Goodwin prepared an amicus brief in the Ninth Circuit in support of Teck Resources, Inc., a Canadian metals and mining company, relating to the types of environmental releases that trigger liability under CERCLA. This case involves the significant issue of whether cross-boundary movement of pollutants into the United States from…

Read More

In re Loestrin 24FE Antitrust Litigation

In the wake of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in FTC v. Actavis, Goodwin attorneys have been at the forefront of litigating antitrust challenges to settlement agreements between brand and generic pharmaceutical companies. In this case, Goodwin filed an amicus brief on behalf of the Association for Accessible Medicines (formerly…

Read More