Search Results for:

Actelion Clinical Research, Inc., et al. v. Apotex Inc., et al. Amicus Brief

Shire filed a suit for patent infringement under the Hatch-Waxman Act based on Amneal’s filing of an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA). In its suit, Shire sued not only Amneal, the generic pharmaceutical company, but also Johnson Matthey, a company that supplies ingredients for generic products but does not sell…

Read More

Teva Pharmaceuticals USA v. Sandoz

For years, the Federal Circuit was divided over the proper standard of review for claim construction, with precedent providing that review of subsidiary fact-findings is de novo even as several circuit judges objected. In this precedent-setting case, Goodwin attorneys successfully persuaded the Supreme Court to review the standard of review…

Read More

Reynolds v. Middleton

Goodwin attorneys assumed representation of a pro se litigant who brought a First Amendment challenge to a Henrico County, Virginia ordinance restricting roadside speech. Goodwin persuaded the Fourth Circuit to reverse the district court’s grant of summary judgment and held that the county’s ordinance was subject to heightened scrutiny. Reynolds…

Read More

ACLU v. City of Worcester

Goodwin attorneys partnered with attorneys for the ACLU to bring a series of successful First Amendment challenges to local ordinances throughout the country that restrict speech requesting charitable donations. In this action, Goodwin persuaded the Supreme Court to vacate an adverse decision issued by the First Circuit. On remand, Goodwin…

Read More

B&B Hardware v. Hargis Industries

Goodwin attorneys first became involved in this trademark case at the Supreme Court stage, successfully persuading the Supreme Court to grant review and reverse the Eighth Circuit. The Supreme Court held that adjudications by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board  are entitled to issue preclusive effect if the ordinary standards…

Read More