Search Results for:

Massachusetts Institute of Technology v. Shire

Goodwin represented MIT and the Children’s Medical Center Corporation in a dispute against Shire Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Shire Regenerative Medicine, Inc. (collectively, “Shire”) for infringement of two patents concerning the production of a three-dimensional scaffolding that would allow pre-grown cells to produce organ tissue in a patient. Goodwin prevailed in…

Read More

American Freedom Defense Initiative v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority

Goodwin attorneys successfully persuaded the Supreme Court to deny the petition for certiorari in a First Amendment challenge brought by the American Freedom Defense Initiative to the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority’s application of its advertising guidelines. The case raised the question of when a public transit authority creates a designated…

Read More

Joseph A. Pakootas et al. v. State of Washington Amicus Brief

Goodwin prepared an amicus brief in the Ninth Circuit in support of Teck Resources, Inc., a Canadian metals and mining company, relating to the types of environmental releases that trigger liability under CERCLA. This case involves the significant issue of whether cross-boundary movement of pollutants into the United States from…

Read More

In re Loestrin 24FE Antitrust Litigation

In the wake of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in FTC v. Actavis, Goodwin attorneys have been at the forefront of litigating antitrust challenges to settlement agreements between brand and generic pharmaceutical companies. In this case, Goodwin filed an amicus brief on behalf of the Association for Accessible Medicines (formerly…

Read More

Acorda Therapeutics Inc. and Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. Amicus Brief

Goodwin filed an amicus brief on behalf of its client, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., in this precedent-setting personal jurisdiction case. Goodwin lawyers argued (and the Federal Circuit ultimately held) that specific personal jurisdiction exists in patent-litigation cases under the Hatch-Waxman Act in any jurisdiction in which an ANDA filer will…

Read More

Tilei v. McGuinness

The Ninth Circuit appointed Goodwin as pro bono counsel to represent an inmate who had filed a complaint alleging that prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. The district court dismissed the plaintiff’s complaint sua sponte and denied his requests for appointed pro bono counsel. Goodwin successfully…

Read More

Tilei v. CDCR

The Ninth Circuit appointed Goodwin as pro bono counsel to represent an inmate who had filed a complaint alleging that prison officials assaulted him in retaliation to his complaints about the prison’s provision of medical care. The district court dismissed the plaintiff’s complaint sua sponte on abstention grounds and denied…

Read More

Cutting v. City of Portland

In response to complaints about “panhandling,” the City of Portland passed a sweeping restriction prohibiting use of the City’s streets and traffic medians for First Amendment activities. Goodwin partnered with the ACLU of Maine to bring a successful First Amendment challenge to Portland’s ordinance. The First Circuit affirmed the permanent…

Read More